By James Broughton, December 30, 2024
Ralf Schumacher, brother of the legendary Michael Schumacher, has been making waves recently with his comments about Lewis Hamilton. Criticizing other drivers, past or present, is nothing new in Formula 1, but Ralf’s remarks seem less about objective analysis and more about defending his older brother’s legacy. His central argument boils down to this: My brother Michael is infinitely better than Lewis Hamilton.
While Ralf has attempted a more nuanced critique of Hamilton’s impending move to Ferrari in 2025, his criticisms appear to be emotionally charged, aimed at safeguarding Michael Schumacher’s towering achievements.
Michael Schumacher’s legacy at Ferrari is undeniably monumental. Arriving in 1996, he joined a team that was, at best, floundering. The 1996 Ferrari car was, quite simply, uncompetitive. Despite this, Schumacher managed to win three races against the dominant Williams team. Within two years, he had turned Ferrari’s fortunes around, leading them to five Drivers’ Championships, securing 72 wins and 58 pole positions along the way. His time at Ferrari is etched in the annals of F1 history as a period of unparalleled dominance.
Deranged or Fair?
In contrast, Lewis Hamilton, now in the twilight of his career, faces a different set of circumstances. Statistically speaking, Hamilton will not be able to match Michael Schumacher’s Ferrari record. At 39, Hamilton is already older than most top drivers when they retire. While many F1 drivers bow out between the ages of 35 and 38, Hamilton has defied convention, continuing to compete at a high level well into his late 30s. Hamilton might still have three more years to add to his remarkable career achievements. However, that’s unlikely to be enough time to surpass Schumacher’s Ferrari milestones.
Given these facts, Ralf Schumacher’s critique is puzzling. He accuses Hamilton of being unable to “lead” a team or work effectively with engineers to develop an F1 car, yet he provides no concrete examples to support this claim.
In contrast, Hamilton’s career offers ample evidence to refute such accusations. With Mercedes, Hamilton won six World Championships, amassed 84 wins, and consistently demonstrated his ability to collaborate with engineers and designers. His overall record of 105 wins and 104 pole positions speaks to a high level of technical expertise and adaptability—skills that are essential at the pinnacle of motorsport.
Ralf’s remarks seem to overlook the fundamental truth: no driver wins seven World Championships and 105 races by accident. Hamilton’s achievements are a testament to his talent, technical acumen, and ability to lead a team to success. Rather than detracting from his accomplishments, these criticisms only serve to underscore the weight of Hamilton’s enduring legacy.
